000			03403nam a22003253u 4500
001			drd-68167704
003			Dreier
005			20261021141637.0
007			cr||||||||||||
008			261019b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9780228027386 _9978-0-2280-2738-6
040			_cRU-10907106
041			_aeng
100	1		_aWilson, Sophia _4aut _eAuthor _969839
245	1	0	_aMaidan _bUkraine's Democratic Revolution _cSophia Wilson
264			_aMontreal _bMcGill-Queen's University Press _c2026
300			_a328 Seiten
336			_aText _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aComputermedien _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aOnline-Ressource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aMcGill-Queen's Studies in Protest, Power, and Resistance _v11
500			_aE-Book / Zugriff nur im Lesesaal
505			_aFigures and Tables ixAcknowledgments xiii1 Introduction 32 State-Society Dialogue, Part I: 30 November-31 December 2013 413 State-Society Dialogue, Part II: January-February 2014 854 Grassroots Movements as State-Society and Intra-Society Dialogue 1225 Revolutionary Socialization and Change 1786 Conclusion: Revolution as State-Society and Intra-Society Dialogue 212Epilogue: The Maidan and Kremlin Propaganda 236Appendices1 The Heavenly Hundred - Maidan Casualties 2492 Survey Demographics 2523 Number of Protesters and Protester Injuries 254Notes 265Works Cited 293Index 325
520			_aThe 2013-14 Maidan Revolution, or Revolution of Dignity, was far more than a series of protests: the coalescence of complex social networks formed a powerful grassroots movement that restored democracy to a country slipping into authoritarianism. Maidan gives a carefully researched account of the underbelly of the resistance process, investigating how participants self-organized to create the resistance, why the peaceful movement eventually turned to violence, and how the revolutionary process changed those who came to change the country.Democratic revolution is a state-society dialogue about rights, and the regime that results depends on the ideas negotiated during revolutionary socialization. Offering an unparalleled opportunity to see that negotiation in action, Maidan draws on more than one hundred personal interviews, oral histories, legal documents, and court hearings. The Ukrainian state used violence and violations of due process to suppress the resistance, thereby declaring new boundaries in rights relations. In turn, the people pushed back in multiple arenas - the protest square, courtrooms, hospitals, churches, and media - to successfully challenge the constitutionality of the states actions.Western media accounts tend to oversimplify the Revolution of Dignity as backlash against President Viktor Yanukovychs decision not to sign a European Union agreement. The reality had far deeper implications for the geopolitics of the region. Sophia Wilsons account of the revolution, and the Kremlin propaganda about it, underscores why it is impossible to understand Russias invasion of Ukraine without first understanding what fuelled the Maidan: the affirmation of democracy and the rooting out of Russian puppet authoritarianism.
648			_a2013-2014 _969459
650			_aEuromaidan _915853
651			_aUkraine
856			_zVolltext _uhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=4585019
942			_cEB _2z
999			_c74739 _d74739