| 000 | 02725nam a22003973u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | drd-7333722 | ||
| 003 | Dreier | ||
| 005 | 20261015171151.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 261015b e ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9781009736992 _9978-1-009-73699-2 |
||
| 040 | _cRU-10907106 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aRupprecht, Tobias _4aut _eAuthor _969836 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe Tragedy of Soviet Market Economists _bThe Failed Quest to Civilise Russia, 1972-2022 _cTobias Rupprecht |
| 264 |
_aCambridge _bCambridge University Press _c2026 |
||
| 300 | _a360 Seiten | ||
| 336 |
_aText _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_aComputermedien _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aOnline-Ressource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 500 | _aE-Book / Zugriff nur im Lesesaal | ||
| 505 | _aIntroduction: the dilemmas of peripheral liberalism; 1. Crisis: economic expertise and politics in a stagnating Soviet Union, 1972-1985; 2. Catastrophe: economic debate, generational divide, and failed reform during perestroika, 1985-1991; 3. Hubris: liberals in power, and the limits to liberal power, in the new Russia, 1991-2000; 4. Diabolus ex machina: Russian liberals and the rise of authoritarian state capitalism, 2000-2022; Conclusion: the failure of Russian peripheral liberalism; Bibliography. | ||
| 520 | _aIn this path-breaking history, Tobias Rupprecht offers a revisionist account of Russia's post-Soviet marketisation from the perspective of the advisors and ministers who oversaw this transformation. Based on extensive interviews with economists and research in state and private archives, he uncovers a significant minority of economic liberals from late Soviet academic and dissident circles who sought to chart a new path, believing free prices and private property were the foundations of a 'civilised country'. This provides a vital challenge to the dominant narrative that neoliberal advisors and organisations imposed harmful reforms on Russia after the collapse of Communism. Liberal reformers faced a profound dilemma - one for which Western advisors had no solution either: should they commit to democratic political activism and risk irrelevance, or align themselves with those in power and be co-opted by an authoritarian state determined to reassert its imperial strength? | ||
| 648 |
_a1972-2022 _969845 |
||
| 650 | _aWirtschaftssystem | ||
| 650 |
_aSozioökonomischer Wandel _94754 |
||
| 650 | _aLiberalismus | ||
| 650 | _aPolitische Ökonomie | ||
| 650 |
_aPerestroika _97033 |
||
| 650 | _aMarktwirtschaft | ||
| 650 |
_aStaatskapitalismus _969846 |
||
| 651 | _aSowjetunion | ||
| 651 | _aRussland | ||
| 856 |
_zVolltext _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009736992 |
||
| 942 |
_cEB _2z |
||
| 999 |
_c74736 _d74736 |
||