000			02585nam a22003013u 4500
001			drd-56605102
003			Dreier
005			20260317161716.0
007			cr||||||||||||
008			260317b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 ger d
020			_a9781009089630 _9978-1-009-08963-0
040			_cRU-10907106
041			_aeng
100	1		_aHall, Stephen G. F. _4aut _eAuthor _922148
245	1	0	_aThe Authoritarian International _bTracing How Authoritarian Regimes Learn in the Post-Soviet Space _cStephen G. F. Hall
264			_aCambridge _bCambridge University Press _c2023
300			_axxviii, 271 Seiten
336			_aText _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aComputermedien _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aOnline-Ressource _bcr _2rdacarrier
500			_aE-Book / Zugriff nur im Lesesaal
505			_a1. Introduction - A Contextual Overview; 2. Measuring Authoritarian Tendencies in Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine; 3. Learning from External Failure; 4. Learning from Internal Failure; 5. Learning from External and Internal Success; 6. The Role of Regional Organisations in Authoritarian Learning; 7. External and Internal Learning in State Institutions; 8. How External and Internal Informal Networks Shape Learning in Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine; 9. Conclusion.
520			_aStephen Hall argues that democracies can preserve their norms and values from increasing attacks and backsliding by better understanding how authoritarian regimes learn. He focuses on the post-Soviet region, investigating two established authoritarian regimes, Belarus and Russia, and two hybrid-regimes, Moldova and Ukraine, with the aim of explaining the concept of authoritarian learning and revealing the practices that are developed and the sources of that learning. Hall finds clear signs of collaboration between countries in developing best survival practices between authoritarian-minded elites, and demonstrates that learning does not just occur between states, rather it can happen at the intra-state level, with elites learning lessons from previous regimes in their own countries. He highlights the horizontal nature of this learning, with authoritarian-minded elites developing methods from a range of sources to ascertain the best practices for survival. Post-Soviet regional organisations are crucial for the development and sharing of these survival practices as they provide 'learning rooms' and training exercises.
650			_aAutoritärer Staat
651			_aOsteuropa
856			_zVolltext _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009089630
942			_cEB _2z
999			_c73951 _d73951