000			02755nam a22003133u 4500
001			drd-2538212
003			Dreier
005			20251212133748.0
007			cr||||||||||||
008			251211b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 ger d
020			_a9781501750137 _9978-1-5017-5013-7
040			_cRU-10907106
041			_aeng
100	1		_aRiegg, Stephen Badalyan _4aut _eAuthor _967951
245	1	0	_aRussia's Entangled Embrace _bThe Tsarist Empire and the Armenians, 1801-1914 _cStephen Badalyan Riegg
264			_aNY _bCornell University Press _c2020
300			_a330 Seiten
336			_aText _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aComputermedien _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aOnline-Ressource _bcr _2rdacarrier
500			_aE-Book / Zugriff nur im Lesesaal
505			_aIntroduction 1. The Embrace of an Empire, 1801-1813 2. Armenians in the Russian Political Imagination, 1814-1829 3. Integration and Reorientation: Religious and Economic Challenges in 1830-1856 4. The Recalibration of Tsarist Policies toward Armenians inside and outside Russia 1857-1880 5. The Shining of the Sabers: Ebbing Symbiosis, Rising Strife, 1881-1895 6. Nadir and Normalization, 1896-1914 Conclusion
520			_aRussia's Entangled Embrace traces the relationship between the Romanov state and the Armenian diaspora that populated Russia's territorial fringes and navigated the tsarist empire's metropolitan centers. By engaging the ongoing debates about imperial structures that were simultaneously symbiotic and hierarchically ordered, Stephen Badalyan Riegg helps us to understand how, for Armenians and some other subjects, imperial rule represented not hypothetical, clear-cut alternatives but simultaneous, messy realities. He examines why, and how, Russian architects of empire imagined Armenians as being politically desirable. These circumstances included the familiarity of their faith, perceived degree of social, political, or cultural integration, and their actual or potential contributions to the state's varied priorities. Based on extensive research in the archives of St. Petersburg, Moscow, and Yerevan, Russia's Entangled Embrace reveals that the Russian government relied on Armenians to build its empire in the Caucasus and beyond. Analyzing the complexities of this imperial relationship-beyond the reductive question of whether Russia was a friend or foe to Armenians-allows us to study the methods of tsarist imperialism in the context of diasporic distribution, interimperial conflict and alliance, nationalism, and religious and economic identity.
648			_a1801-1914 _967954
650			_aArmenier _94969
651			_aRussland
856			_zVolltext _uhttps://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501750113.001.0001
942			_cEB _2z
999			_c73406 _d73406