000			02150nam a22002893u 4500
001			drd-4611080
003			Dreier
005			20250910113139.0
007			cr||||||||||||
008			250910b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 ger d
020			_a9781009664738 _9978-1-009-66473-8
040			_cRU-10907106
041			_aeng
100	1		_aLenton, Adam _4aut _eAuthor _966866
245	1	0	_aDecolonizing Russia? _bDisentangling Debates _cAdam Lenton
264			_aCambridge _bCambridge University Press _c2025
300			_a78 Seiten
336			_aText _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aComputermedien _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aOnline-Ressource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aElements in Soviet and Post-Soviet History
500			_aE-Book / Zugriff nur im Lesesaal
505			_a1. Introduction; 2. Identity and Empire in Russian History; 3. The Soviet Rule: Decolonial in Form, Colonial in Content?; 4. Post-Socialist Transition: Decolonization and Recolonization; 5. Decolonization and Its International Dimension; 6. Decolonization as Scholarship; 7. Conclusion.
520			_aRussia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 radically changed the way many viewed the nature of the Russian state. The centrality of resentment and imperial nostalgia in Russian narratives led many to argue that Russian imperialism was a key force behind the invasion. By extension, this led to the idea that decolonization - largely in scholarship, but also among some policy circles - offered a way to better understanding Russia in this new context. To this end, this Element examines the debates over decolonization in the Russian case. It begins by contextualizing these debates through an examination of Russia's historical development as an empire. It then identifies and disentangles three key focal points: decolonization as domestic Russian politics, the transnational politics of decolonization, and decolonization as a scholarly endeavor. By doing so, this Element shows where decolonization has merit, but also where it is contested or limited.
856			_zVolltext _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009664738
942			_cEB _2z
999			_c72809 _d72809